蓉姐

我觉得梁家辉演的很牛逼，谁赞成谁反对？

很一般的电影 冲着朱莉才看的 故事构架趋于俗套 不过这可是1999年的作品 这样看来也应在当时引起轰动 但较之原著 还是限定了受众思维 这种题材的东西 一定要通过文字 才能感受到魅力 影像侮辱了受众的智商 因为全息性视角 不适合影像展示

不恨人 但恨己 恨自己心中的野兽

4.5; Never before have I seen a zombie film with so many layers. The symbolic meaning of the infection is announced from the very beginning through footage and words to be 'rage', and the violence induced by it henceforward becomes the centre of the film's criticism. But what adds to the film's complexity is the fact that the protagonist is empowered only by rage to fight for those he loves and defeat the purposeless soldiers, who by contrast fight for nothing but themselves. The film thus indicates a place for violence in humanity and hints that violence is not inherently the abject. It also draws a comparison between two archetypes of fatherhood: permissive & autocratic

原本可以很好看很耐人寻味的片子，却有一种说不出的生硬、别扭，各种舞台腔、文艺腔、直白的说教、蛋疼的感慨。杨德昌的愤世嫉俗总搞的像是中二病。